Winning Talent Development Firms Serve Their Customers

Content

While it’s difficult to identify any of the 12 winning strategies as most important, serving and satisfying one’s customers must vie for one of the top spots. Without customers, we have no one to serve and thus no business. But, if it were easy, more businesses would be highly successful and competitive. As it turns out, the leading businesses worldwide almost invariably tend to have the highest Net Promoter Scores\* (NPS), a measure of customer satisfaction, compared with their competitors.

While it’s difficult to identify any of the 12 winning strategies as most important, serving and satisfying one’s customers must vie for one of the top spots. Without customers, we have no one to serve and thus no business. But, if it were easy, more businesses would be highly successful and competitive. As it turns out, the leading businesses worldwide almost invariably tend to have the highest Net Promoter Scores\* (NPS), a measure of customer satisfaction, compared with their competitors.

Content

So how exactly do you achieve a high NPS? Part of the underlying formula is an unswerving cultural commitment to customer satisfaction and obtaining their equally unswerving loyalty. Usually, this means abiding by that age-old saying “the customer is always right,” whether this is the case. Yet, this mental mindset is a starting foundation and likely to achieve higher customer satisfaction than the obverse. Second, the offer itself, whether a product or service, must continually meet and even exceed the customer’s expectations. It must stand out competitively in terms of quality, price, and value. Third, you must establish internal processes that make it easy for customers to acquire, use, reuse, and dispose of whatever product or service is offered.

So how exactly do you achieve a high NPS? Part of the underlying formula is an unswerving cultural commitment to customer satisfaction and obtaining their equally unswerving loyalty. Usually, this means abiding by that age-old saying “the customer is always right,” whether this is the case. Yet, this mental mindset is a starting foundation and likely to achieve higher customer satisfaction than the obverse. Second, the offer itself, whether a product or service, must continually meet and even exceed the customer’s expectations. It must stand out competitively in terms of quality, price, and value. Third, you must establish internal processes that make it easy for customers to acquire, use, reuse, and dispose of whatever product or service is offered.

Content

As we know, this is often easier said than done. But relatively simple guidelines can ensure loyal customers. Perhaps the most important is knowing who these are. There are buyers, decision-makers, and users in most industries, and these often aren’t necessarily the same people. But each may have a role in the purchasing process. Buyers , typically from the purchasing department, use only price as the most important criteria for purchase decisions. Decision-makers usually prioritize strategic return, or ROI, as their guiding criteria. And, to the extent users are not the same as the former two groups, they are more likely to value what the offer does for them in providing the skills and knowledge to improve their performance. For all three groups, however, there appears to be common criteria linking them, guided by the “less is more” mantra. That is, teach employees what they must know to perform their best and do so as stress-free, quickly, and cheaply as possible.

As we know, this is often easier said than done. But relatively simple guidelines can ensure loyal customers. Perhaps the most important is knowing who these are. There are buyers, decision-makers, and users in most industries, and these often aren’t necessarily the same people. But each may have a role in the purchasing process. Buyers, typically from the purchasing department, use only price as the most important criteria for purchase decisions. Decision-makers usually prioritize strategic return, or ROI, as their guiding criteria. And, to the extent users are not the same as the former two groups, they are more likely to value what the offer does for them in providing the skills and knowledge to improve their performance. For all three groups, however, there appears to be common criteria linking them, guided by the “less is more” mantra. That is, teach employees what they must know to perform their best and do so as stress-free, quickly, and cheaply as possible.

Content

It is relatively easy to lose your customers quickly if all the above aren’t consistently met. Customer loyalty is hard to achieve but harder to maintain as the expectations and demand for service increase. So here are some surefire ways to lose customers:

It is relatively easy to lose your customers quickly if all the above aren’t consistently met. Customer loyalty is hard to achieve but harder to maintain as the expectations and demand for service increase. So here are some surefire ways to lose customers:

• Content

  Overpromise and underdeliver.

  Overpromise and underdeliver.

• Content

  Tell them they are wrong.

  Tell them they are wrong.

• Content

  Be rigid and inflexible.

  Be rigid and inflexible.

• Content

  Nickel and dime them.

  Nickel and dime them.

• Content

  Don’t listen.

  Don’t listen.

• Content

  Don’t be available.

  Don’t be available.

• Content

  Violate their confidentiality.

  Violate their confidentiality.

• Content

  Keep supporting information to yourself.

  Keep supporting information to yourself.

• Content

  Overcharge inexplicably.

  Overcharge inexplicably.

• Content

  Bad-mouth your competitors.

  Bad-mouth your competitors.

• Content

  Believe you have the best solution.

  Believe you have the best solution.

• Content

  Don’t renew an old and tired offer.

  Don’t renew an old and tired offer.

Content

On the other hand, although perhaps heresy in any industry, some customers must be fired. They are not worth the time and effort required to satisfy their needs and demands. There are many reasons justifying such action, including lack of integrity, professionalism, and interpersonal skill. These usually aren’t difficult to assess because they usually interfere with delivering what was promised. So perhaps the most important guidance, ironically, when firing a customer is how to do this in a professional and interpersonally skilled manner. Here are the only four options you have.

On the other hand, although perhaps heresy in any industry, some customers must be fired. They are not worth the time and effort required to satisfy their needs and demands. There are many reasons justifying such action, including lack of integrity, professionalism, and interpersonal skill. These usually aren’t difficult to assess because they usually interfere with delivering what was promised. So perhaps the most important guidance, ironically, when firing a customer is how to do this in a professional and interpersonally skilled manner. Here are the only four options you have.

• Content

  Say goodbye by completing what you currently do for them.

  Say goodbye by completing what you currently do for them.

• Content

  Confront the client with your concerns, laying out the situation honestly and transparently.

  Confront the client with your concerns, laying out the situation honestly and transparently.

• Content

  Negotiate a settlement if there is any contention about your deliverables.

  Negotiate a settlement if there is any contention about your deliverables.

• Content

  Grin and bear it by simply sticking it out with the client, hoping no other similar situations arise.

  Grin and bear it by simply sticking it out with the client, hoping no other similar situations arise.

Content

Lastly, in settling any customer challenges wherein things aren’t going according to plan, four service recovery strategies will help to further serve both your and the customer’s best interests. These are based on two situational elements: 1) the “severity” of the situation to the client, and 2) whose “fault” it is. When these are laid out, it looks like the following:

Lastly, in settling any customer challenges wherein things aren’t going according to plan, four service recovery strategies will help to further serve both your and the customer’s best interests. These are based on two situational elements: 1) the “severity” of the situation to the client, and 2) whose “fault” it is. When these are laid out, it looks like the following:

Content

The possible actions within the four strategies vary but can be filled in with basic common sense. Service recovery strategies, whether these or others, should be well thought through with criteria for each laid out so you can quickly resolve any issues and move forward.

The possible actions within the four strategies vary but can be filled in with basic common sense. Service recovery strategies, whether these or others, should be well thought through with criteria for each laid out so you can quickly resolve any issues and move forward.

Content

As you review how you serve your customers, ask yourself to what extent you have covered the bases and established criteria for determining who you are serving, how your offer meets their expectations, what you can do to ensure you keep them, and in the hopefully rare case, under what circumstances would you fire some.

As you review how you serve your customers, ask yourself to what extent you have covered the bases and established criteria for determining who you are serving, how your offer meets their expectations, what you can do to ensure you keep them, and in the hopefully rare case, under what circumstances would you fire some.

Content

\*NPS is calculated on a 0 to 10 continuum from lowest to highest rating on the simple question to customers: “Would you recommend X company? The computation is taken by subtracting the percentage of Detractors (ratings 0 to 6) from the percentage of Promotors (ratings 9 and 10). For example, if 60 percent of your survey respondents fall into the Promotor rating range but 40 percent fall into the Detractor range, the NPS is 20. Obviously, the bigger this gap, the higher the NPS. NPS scores above 50 are considered very good but leading companies frequently post in the 80s or 90s.

\*NPS is calculated on a 0 to 10 continuum from lowest to highest rating on the simple question to customers: “Would you recommend X company? The computation is taken by subtracting the percentage of Detractors (ratings 0 to 6) from the percentage of Promotors (ratings 9 and 10). For example, if 60 percent of your survey respondents fall into the Promotor rating range but 40 percent fall into the Detractor range, the NPS is 20. Obviously, the bigger this gap, the higher the NPS. NPS scores above 50 are considered very good but leading companies frequently post in the 80s or 90s.