ATD Blog
4 Minimum Authorities that Every Manager Must Have
Thu Nov 29 2012
Content
Manager: a person in a role in which he or she is held accountable not only for their own personal effectiveness but also for the output of others; and is accountable for building and sustaining an effective team of subordinates capable of producing those outputs, and for exercising effective leadership. (Jaques 1998)
Manager: a person in a role in which he or she is held accountable not only for their own personal effectiveness but also for the output of others; and is accountable for building and sustaining an effective team of subordinates capable of producing those outputs, and for exercising effective leadership. (Jaques 1998)
Content
If we are to hold a Manager Accountable for the output of their subordinates they must have some control over who their subordinates are.
If we are to hold a Manager Accountable for the output of their subordinates they must have some control over who their subordinates are.
Content
Below are the 4 Minimum authorities that every manager must have in order to be an effective and trustworthy managerial leader.
Below are the 4 Minimum authorities that every manager must have in order to be an effective and trustworthy managerial leader.
Content
Authority to reject a subordinate to fill a position
Authority to reject a subordinate to fill a position
Content
Authority to deselect a subordinate after due process
Authority to deselect a subordinate after due process
Content
Authority to decide task assignments
Authority to decide task assignments
Content
Authority to decide personal effectiveness appraisal and merit recognition
Authority to decide personal effectiveness appraisal and merit recognition
Content
**_1. Authority to reject a subordinate to fill a position.
**_1. Authority to reject a subordinate to fill a position.
Content
_**All managers should be provided the unequivocal authority to turn down any candidate who may be offered from above.
_**All managers should be provided the unequivocal authority to turn down any candidate who may be offered from above.
Content
Not on personal grounds, BUT only if their judgment is that the candidate cannot do the necessary work.
Not on personal grounds, BUT only if their judgment is that the candidate cannot do the necessary work.
Content
By providing this authority you can get rid much of the tension and unease amongst managers.
By providing this authority you can get rid much of the tension and unease amongst managers.
Content
Managers should not have excessive say over who gets hired, what they should have say over is who they want on their team. This must be established through the employee’s ability for doing the work that is required in that role. NOT from personal feelings, favoritism, or vendettas. This is easier said than done.
Managers should not have excessive say over who gets hired, what they should have say over is who they want on their team. This must be established through the employee’s ability for doing the work that is required in that role. NOT from personal feelings, favoritism, or vendettas. This is easier said than done.
Content
**2. _Authority to deselect a subordinate after due process
**2. _Authority to deselect a subordinate after due process
Content
_ All managers should be provided with the unequivocal authority to decide that a particular person, who is no longer working at a minimum effectiveness required for their role, whether due to loss of commitment, not keeping up with new knowledge and technology, whatever the reason, will no longer keep their position with that manager .**
_All managers should be provided with the unequivocal authority to decide that a particular person, who is no longer working at a minimum effectiveness required for their role, whether due to loss of commitment, not keeping up with new knowledge and technology, whatever the reason, will no longer keep their position with that manager.**
Content
This does not mean that the Manager has the authority to terminate or fire the employee. The subordinate has done nothing wrong, and just cannot or will not keep up with the minimum effectiveness needed to fill the role.
This does not mean that the Manager has the authority to terminate or fire the employee. The subordinate has done nothing wrong, and just cannot or will not keep up with the minimum effectiveness needed to fill the role.
Content
Termination of employment comes from flagrant or repeated infractions against regulations, policies and procedures of the organization. These infractions are against the organization and must be dealt with not by the immediate manager but by an official acting on behalf of the organization.
Termination of employment comes from flagrant or repeated infractions against regulations, policies and procedures of the organization. These infractions are against the organization and must be dealt with not by the immediate manager but by an official acting on behalf of the organization.
Content
Managers DON’T need to be given the authority to terminate employees at will; that authority must lie higher up in the organization.
Managers DON’T need to be given the authority to terminate employees at will; that authority must lie higher up in the organization.
Content
The manager however MUST have the authority to de-select individuals who are no longer working to the effectiveness needed to fill the role.
The manager however MUST have the authority to de-select individuals who are no longer working to the effectiveness needed to fill the role.
Content
General process for de-selection
General process for de-selection
Content
Manager is required to warn the subordinate that they are not doing well enough
Manager is required to warn the subordinate that they are not doing well enough
Content
Manager must inform their own manager of the situation
Manager must inform their own manager of the situation
Content
Manager must offer coaching for a reasonable amount of time
Manager must offer coaching for a reasonable amount of time
Content
If there is no improvement, manager warns again, coaches again
If there is no improvement, manager warns again, coaches again
Content
Still no improvement – Decide to Deselect and inform the subordinate and the managers manager.
Still no improvement – Decide to Deselect and inform the subordinate and the managers manager.
Content
This process, when properly implemented, strips managers of opportunities to complain about subordinates and puts the accountability of the subordinates work squarely on the shoulders of the manager (where it belongs) . If a subordinate is not getting the work done, stop complaining and institute the de-selection process, and start coaching **.**
This process, when properly implemented, strips managers of opportunities to complain about subordinates and puts the accountability of the subordinates work squarely on the shoulders of the manager (where it belongs). If a subordinate is not getting the work done, stop complaining and institute the de-selection process, and start coaching**.**
Content
**3. _Authority to decide task assignments.
**3. _Authority to decide task assignments.
Content
_**Accountable managers must be able to decide what types of task assignments they give to subordinates. They must not be bypassed by their own managers.
_**Accountable managers must be able to decide what types of task assignments they give to subordinates. They must not be bypassed by their own managers.
Content
If we are to hold a manager accountable for the output of their subordinates the ability to decide delegation and planning of tasks is necessary.
If we are to hold a manager accountable for the output of their subordinates the ability to decide delegation and planning of tasks is necessary.
Content
**4. _Authority to decide personal effectiveness appraisal and merit recognition
**4. _Authority to decide personal effectiveness appraisal and merit recognition
Content
_**Emphasis on the phrase ‘To Decide’. The decision is determining and deciding the level of effectiveness of a subordinate in their role at work. All that can be expected of people at work is to do their best; the manager is to be held accountable for the output of their team. This decision of “is the employee doing their best” can only be made by the direct manager.
_**Emphasis on the phrase ‘To Decide’. The decision is determining and deciding the level of effectiveness of a subordinate in their role at work. All that can be expected of people at work is to do their best; the manager is to be held accountable for the output of their team. This decision of “is the employee doing their best” can only be made by the direct manager.
Content
If during the effectiveness appraisal, or sooner, the manager determines that the subordinate is not doing their best, then the process of coaching and possibly de-selection takes place. The other area is merit recognition, pay increases based upon the effectiveness of the employee. Again the manager is to decide the proper level, based upon the effectiveness appraisal.
If during the effectiveness appraisal, or sooner, the manager determines that the subordinate is not doing their best, then the process of coaching and possibly de-selection takes place. The other area is merit recognition, pay increases based upon the effectiveness of the employee. Again the manager is to decide the proper level, based upon the effectiveness appraisal.
Content
Without the 4 minimum managerial authorities described above you cannot truly hold managers accountable for the output of their subordinates. If managers are truly accountable, then they must have each of the 4 authorities and the proper training and development to use them.
Without the 4 minimum managerial authorities described above you cannot truly hold managers accountable for the output of their subordinates. If managers are truly accountable, then they must have each of the 4 authorities and the proper training and development to use them.
Content
**Referenced:
**Referenced:
Content
**Jaques, E. (1998). Requisite organization . (Third ed.).
**Jaques, E. (1998). Requisite organization. (Third ed.).
Content
Arlington, VA: Cason Hall & Co.
Arlington, VA: Cason Hall & Co.