ATD, association for talent development

ATD Blog

Beyond the Survey: Why L&D Needs More Than Smile Sheets to Show Impact

Here are some practical first steps to help you prove learning ROI and effectiveness.

By

Tue Oct 28 2025

Time to Flip the Script on Evaluation
Loading...

Brought to you by

Training at work is a critical stepping stone for professional development. So, businesses must surely take learning evaluation methods seriously, right?

Employers only tend to evaluate certain parts of the training experience. ATD’s research shows that 93 percent of organizations use participant satisfaction surveys to assess training quality. Unfortunately, far fewer (42 percent) measure actual behavior change data.

The former definitely has its place. Dissatisfaction is a solid indicator that training doesn’t meet learner needs. Unfortunately, these surveys only tell us how someone felt, not what they learned and applied.

After all, if your data isn’t tied to performance, are you really measuring learning?

What Do Surveys Miss?

The satisfaction surveys businesses use (aka “smile sheets”) are a reasonable window into how people feel about training, but fall short as learning evaluation methods for a few reasons:

  • Bias towards positive feedback: Employees might respond positively to training because it was easy, or because they don’t want to make waves, meaning that even satisfaction data isn’t fully reliable.

  • Doesn’t measure knowledge or behavior change: Satisfaction surveys don’t capture learning impact, meaning you have no idea just how much knowledge employees retain.

  • Often collected too soon: Surveying employees during or just after training means that they may not yet realize whether or not their training is useful.

What to Measure Instead

ATD’s findings show that only 4 percent of organizations rated themselves extremely proficient at measuring learning impact. Compared to the majority, these businesses generally have a few things in common:

  • They tend to use four or more data sources.

  • They’re more likely to include performance reviews as a data source.

  • Proficient businesses inform impact with behavioral and business data (for example, project KPIs or manager feedback).

By focusing solely on satisfaction and learning objectives, less skilled organizations typically employ only the first stage of the Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation (reaction), while also briefly exploring the second stage (learning) through learning goals.

The top 4 percent of businesses, on the other hand, break into stages three and four (behavior and results) by tracking:

  • Goal attainment

  • Time to achieve competence

  • Behavior changes over time

Diversify Your Data

Diversifying your data might sound complicated, but don’t worry. Here are some practical first steps to help you prove learning ROI and effectiveness:

  • Start small: Survey data is still a useful tool. You can pair it with other more business-relevant data points like KPIs or time to productivity to give context to employee responses.

  • Talk to managers: Don’t just get feedback from the employees doing the learning, but also their immediate line managers. Employees are great for personal insights, but bosses will give you the big picture on learning impact from their perspective.

  • Connect LMS insights: Use tools like Power BI to connect learning data to performance metrics to end the disconnect between training and real work.

  • More data sources: It’s worth repeating that you need several relevant data sources for L&D to get meaningful insights. Don’t be satisfied with less than four that provide a complementary blend of learning and performance data.

A Solution to L&D’s Problem

Many organizations have turned to modern LMS platforms like Learn365 to relieve the burden. They have a few key benefits when it comes to streamlining data-heavy L&D management.

First, it’s possible to automate post-training assessment with KPIs or virtual grading processes. Second, you can connect training platforms to the tools employees already use (such as by embedding your LMS into Microsoft Teams).

Third, feeding learning and performance data into real-time dashboards provides combined metrics with more depth. This also means that stakeholders and L&D leaders don’t have to wait for a fresh report.

Don’t Limit Your L&D Vision

If you only take one lesson from our insights, let it be this: If you’re solely relying on survey data, you’re missing the big picture. Learning programs without business and performance insights are like ships at sea without charts.

We recommend evaluating your last three training programs to figure out what you really know about their impact.

Don’t miss the opportunity to transform your L&D function into a business powerhouse. Download the Zensai + ATD report to guide your internal audit. You’ll see firsthand what leading organizations are doing to connect learning with performance and create lasting success.

You've Reached ATD Member-only Content

Become an ATD member to continue

Already a member?Sign In


Copyright © 2025 ATD

ASTD changed its name to ATD to meet the growing needs of a dynamic, global profession.

Terms of UsePrivacy NoticeCookie Policy