Conservatives Necessary for Change: A Paradox? Part 1

Content

People have different attitudes toward change. Some love it, dream about it, get energized by it, and usually initiate it. They are lauded as champions of change. Sociologists have names for them: innovators and visionaries.

People have different attitudes toward change. Some love it, dream about it, get energized by it, and usually initiate it. They are lauded as champions of change. Sociologists have names for them: innovators and visionaries.

Content

Then, there are the people who hate change. Their argument is usually something like, “What’s wrong with the way we are now?” or “This is how it’s always been done!” These people are generally accused of being the spoilsports of change, setting up roadblocks to progress. Sociologists have names for them, too: conservatives and pragmatists.

Then, there are the people who hate change. Their argument is usually something like, “What’s wrong with the way we are now?” or “This is how it’s always been done!” These people are generally accused of being the spoilsports of change, setting up roadblocks to progress. Sociologists have names for them, too: conservatives and pragmatists.

Content

If it was only up to them, the innovators would love to make the conservatives disappear, and vice versa. But all societies, organizations, and even families have these two warring factions. In spite of that, change occurs and progress happens.

If it was only up to them, the innovators would love to make the conservatives disappear, and vice versa. But all societies, organizations, and even families have these two warring factions. In spite of that, change occurs and progress happens. 

Content

Is this because the innovators and visionaries ultimately get their way? I don't think so.

Is this because the innovators and visionaries ultimately get their way? I don't think so.

Content

Let’s imagine that there are no conservatives in a society or organization. Change lovers would run rampant and there would be too much change. According to Alvin Toffler, a renowned sociologist, too much change is “an enemy of life” itself, which means an organization will die if it changes too much, too fast.

Let’s imagine that there are no conservatives in a society or organization. Change lovers would run rampant and there would be too much change. According to Alvin Toffler, a renowned sociologist, too much change is “an enemy of life” itself, which means an organization will die if it changes too much, too fast.

Content

What do you think would happen if there were no innovators or visionaries? With no change, an organization would stagnate, become obsolete, and perish. It is clear that societies and organizations that have been in existence for decades or even centuries learned to use both innovative and conservative forces to initiate, institutionalize, and sustain change for survival and progress.

What do you think would happen if there were no innovators or visionaries? With no change, an organization would stagnate, become obsolete, and perish. It is clear that societies and organizations that have been in existence for decades or even centuries learned to use both innovative and conservative forces to initiate, institutionalize, and sustain change for survival and progress.

Content

To get a visual perspective, imagine shoots of a tree as innovators and visionaries, always spreading toward the sky for growth, and roots as conservatives and pragmatists, always going deeper into the earth for stability. A healthy tree needs both its shoots and roots, just like an organization needs both its innovators and pragmatists.

To get a visual perspective, imagine shoots of a tree as innovators and visionaries, always spreading toward the sky for growth, and roots as conservatives and pragmatists, always going deeper into the earth for stability. A healthy tree needs both its shoots and roots, just like an organization needs both its innovators and pragmatists. 

Why Do You Need Conservatives?

Content

Innovators and visionaries are votaries of change. However, they can only initiate change and cannot make it a part of the system. Once they initiate a change, they often lose interest in it and go after the next one. But you need someone who can institutionalize change, nurture it, and make it part of the system.

Innovators and visionaries are votaries of change. However, they can only initiate change and cannot make it a part of the system. Once they initiate a change, they often lose interest in it and go after the next one. But you need someone who can institutionalize change, nurture it, and make it part of the system.

Content

Psychologist Kurt Lewin, in his Field Force theory , suggests that during any process of change, it is essential to accept and proactively use forces that maintain the status quo: conservatives. They provide restraint and the much needed continuity between the old and the new. They absorb change and institutionalize it. So conservatives are not really a hindrance to change; they are essential players who ensure that change becomes permanent.

Psychologist Kurt Lewin, in his Field Force theory, suggests that during any process of change, it is essential to accept and proactively use forces that maintain the status quo: conservatives. They provide restraint and the much needed continuity between the old and the new. They absorb change and institutionalize it. So conservatives are not really a hindrance to change; they are essential players who ensure that change becomes permanent.

Content

In my next blog post, I will share why and how conservatives play a vital role in the change management process.

In my next blog post, I will share why and how conservatives play a vital role in the change management process.