ATD Blog
Improving Employee Engagement in Government—Now More Than Ever
Mon Mar 02 2015
Content
Content
These are tough times for government. Heated budget battles and rhetoric about the size, function, scope, and effectiveness of government have generated criticism not just of government itself, but also of the people who deliver public services to our citizens. Across the country—in Congress, state legislatures, city councils, political speeches and ads, the media, and elsewhere—government agencies and their employees are being denigrated.
These are tough times for government. Heated budget battles and rhetoric about the size, function, scope, and effectiveness of government have generated criticism not just of government itself, but also of the people who deliver public services to our citizens. Across the country—in Congress, state legislatures, city councils, political speeches and ads, the media, and elsewhere—government agencies and their employees are being denigrated.
Content
The recent battle over the budget for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, for example, is just one example of how public servants have become pawns in larger political battles.
The recent battle over the budget for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, for example, is just one example of how public servants have become pawns in larger political battles.
Content
Despite the drumbeat of criticism (or maybe because of it), I believe that the biggest challenge facing government today is attracting, developing, and retaining talent. A key to meeting this challenge is creating the kinds of workplaces that will maximize employee engagement. But government leaders striving to improve engagement face a different set of challenges than private sector leaders, including dealing with the constant barrage of criticism.
Despite the drumbeat of criticism (or maybe because of it), I believe that the biggest challenge facing government today is attracting, developing, and retaining talent. A key to meeting this challenge is creating the kinds of workplaces that will maximize employee engagement. But government leaders striving to improve engagement face a different set of challenges than private sector leaders, including dealing with the constant barrage of criticism.
Content
There is a strong business case for why government jurisdictions and agencies should focus on improving engagement. Study after study has shown that organizations with highly-engaged workforces outperform low-engagement organizations—in strategic goal achievement, productivity, customer service, retention, attendance, and so forth. This is true for both the public and private sectors.
There is a strong business case for why government jurisdictions and agencies should focus on improving engagement. Study after study has shown that organizations with highly-engaged workforces outperform low-engagement organizations—in strategic goal achievement, productivity, customer service, retention, attendance, and so forth. This is true for both the public and private sectors.
Content
However, maintaining a high level of engagement in the public sector is a tough challenge. For example, the 2014 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey revealed that engagement among the nation’s largest employer has declined. Similarly, the 2014 Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings by the Partnership for Public Service showed a decline in federal employee job satisfaction for the fourth year in a row. And, while we don’t have comparable data for state and local government, it is likely that the needle of engagement is moving in the wrong direction in these sectors as well.
However, maintaining a high level of engagement in the public sector is a tough challenge. For example, the 2014 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey revealed that engagement among the nation’s largest employer has declined. Similarly, the 2014 Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings by the Partnership for Public Service showed a decline in federal employee job satisfaction for the fourth year in a row. And, while we don’t have comparable data for state and local government, it is likely that the needle of engagement is moving in the wrong direction in these sectors as well.
Content
After all, criticism of government compounded by the ever-present calls for smaller government, can’t help but affect the morale of public servants.
After all, criticism of government compounded by the ever-present calls for smaller government, can’t help but affect the morale of public servants.
Content
But I try not to focus on problems without offering solutions. The flip side of challenge is opportunity, and I believe that the relatively low level of engagement in government (even the most optimistic results from engagement surveys peg the percentage of engaged employees in government at less than 65 percent), creates the opportunity to improve performance by improving engagement.
But I try not to focus on problems without offering solutions. The flip side of challenge is opportunity, and I believe that the relatively low level of engagement in government (even the most optimistic results from engagement surveys peg the percentage of engaged employees in government at less than 65 percent), creates the opportunity to improve performance by improving engagement.
Content
However, I don’t believe there is a one-size-fits-all solution to improving engagement. Instead, each government jurisdiction and agency needs to:
However, I don’t believe there is a one-size-fits-all solution to improving engagement. Instead, each government jurisdiction and agency needs to:
Content
assess its own level of engagement (ideally through a valid employee engagement survey)
assess its own level of engagement (ideally through a valid employee engagement survey)
Content
analyze the results to determine what areas to focus on
analyze the results to determine what areas to focus on
Content
take action
take action
Content
periodically re-survey to see if engagement is improving.
periodically re-survey to see if engagement is improving.
Content
In other words, agencies shouldn’t administer the medicine before diagnosing the condition.
In other words, agencies shouldn’t administer the medicine before diagnosing the condition.
Content
There are instructive examples of what government organizations have done to improve engagement. These include:
There are instructive examples of what government organizations have done to improve engagement. These include:
Content
providing senior-level strategic leadership on improving engagement
providing senior-level strategic leadership on improving engagement
Content
developing leadership and management competencies around employee engagement
developing leadership and management competencies around employee engagement
Content
improving communication across the organization
improving communication across the organization
Content
managing employee performance more effectively
managing employee performance more effectively
Content
ensuring that employees believe that their opinions count
ensuring that employees believe that their opinions count
Content
creating a positive work environment, such as adopting more flexible work arrangements
creating a positive work environment, such as adopting more flexible work arrangements
Content
improving the onboarding of new employees
improving the onboarding of new employees
Content
clarifying the line of sight between employees’ work and the organization’s mission
clarifying the line of sight between employees’ work and the organization’s mission
Content
span>enhancing employee prospects for career growth
span>enhancing employee prospects for career growth
Content
recognizing employee contributions.
recognizing employee contributions.
Content
While it’s helpful to understand actions public-sector organizations have taken to build engagement, there is no magic bullet. Instead, what’s needed is a systematic assessment of engagement and then a carefully constructed approach to dealing with the issues the data reveal. Creating a culture of engagement—and improving performance—is a marathon, not a sprint.
While it’s helpful to understand actions public-sector organizations have taken to build engagement, there is no magic bullet. Instead, what’s needed is a systematic assessment of engagement and then a carefully constructed approach to dealing with the issues the data reveal. Creating a culture of engagement—and improving performance—is a marathon, not a sprint.
Content
To learn more, join more for the webcast, “ Building a Culture of Employee Engagement ,” March 10, 2015, at 2:00 p.m.
To learn more, join more for the webcast, “Building a Culture of Employee Engagement,” March 10, 2015, at 2:00 p.m.