ATD Blog
Thu Jan 01 1987
Karl Kapp helped me with spark and work through the February 2008 Big Question with me.
In a bit more detail, the critical question seems to be:
For a given project, how do you determine if, when and how much an instructional designer and instructional design is needed? To help you get started, I would recommend looking at some of the thoughts in the following posts:
Cammy Bean - The Value of Instructional Designers - Don't Miss the Comments
Tony Karrer's Big Question Summary - Significant Work Needed to Help Instructional Designers
The more that Cammy and I have explored this topic, the more questions we feel we have:
What value do we really offer beyond a SME with a tool? How do we distinguish the cases where we are needed?
(Reuben Tozman) What skills/knowledge do instructional designers bring to the table that is unique to our profession that other trades do not? Is our value in wielding the latest and greatest rapid development tools? Not if our SME's are using them also? Is it our knowledge of psychometrics when we create assessments? Nope. Is it our writing abilities? Is it our knowledge of communications?Do you think instructional designers should be able to use the tools?
Do you think instructional designers should go away and leave the rapid tools to the SMEs?
If we want SMEs to use rapid eLearning tools to create content, do they need training in ID? What training?
If someone without a background in ID is told to "create this course" - are they doing instructional design? Or is it something different? Is there some kind of range of ID capability? How do you explain the spectrum?
How can I really tell if there was good ID work? Could I have done as well by producing something far less?
If it takes more to create something "better" - do I really need to do that? How about when up-front knowledge of return on investment is not really known?
How is this different in academia vs. corporate.
Cammy's thesis - and I agree - is that ID is widely varied. But with that variety comes a big question of the value of ID as compared to a SME with a Wiki or rapid eLearning tool.
How to Respond:
Please post on your blog or put thoughts in a comment and I'll put a link to your post. You will get bonus points for:
Including a link to this post and even better include the Big Question logo.
In your comment, provide an HTML ready link that I can simply copy and paste. In other words - please include an HTML anchor tag in your comment. PLEASE.
Posts So Far:
Manish Mohan - ongoing discussions
Jay Cross - My two cents.
Learning Circuit's big question for Feb 2008 Instructional Design ...
Tony Karrer - Common Sense and Intuition Not Enough
Clark Quinn - My $0.05.
Benjamin Hamilton - My Thoughts
Nicola Avery - mine
Donald Clark - On Design
Cammy Bean - The Big Question: Instructional Design as Spectrum
Mick Leyden - Here is my take
Michael Hanley - My Reply: ISD - on the precipice of a crossroads?
Anil Mammen - Instructional Design - If, When and But
Geetha Krishnan - response
Jack Pierce and I (Tony Karrer) had a recent back and forth around a closely related topic:
See the comments
w/Mindshare: Juggling eLearning vs Online Training
Vinnie - How much ID do we need?
Peter Isackson - my contribution
Jane Bozarth - When is design done (short, but good ... does it prove itself in her post?)
John Shaffer - Is ISD Needed?
Malinka Ivanova - Instructional Design as a Building Skeleton
Gary Hegenbart - Why Bother with Instructional Design?
Tony Karrer - Safety Training Design : eLearning Technology
Viplav Baxi - My two cents here
Manish Gupta -G-Cube: Training - One Fourth Preparation; Three-Fourths Theatre
Jeffrey Keefer - Silence and Voice
Karl Kapp: We Need a Degree in Instructional Design
Karl has touched off some reaction - see:
Need for ISDers
Christy Tucker Patterns in Instructional Design Responses
A tag cloud of the words used in the discussion - fun way to look at it.
You've Reached ATD Member-only Content
Become an ATD member to continue
Already a member?Sign In
More from ATD