ATD Blog
Wed Feb 27 2019
In my previous blog post, I positioned thinking and planning strategically as two independent but integrated elements of an effective overall business planning process that would more likely ensure proper and timely execution. There are certainly a number of ways to dissect the topic of strategic planning, why and when it works best, and what is necessary to prevent failure. But, as noted in that blog, we hardly ever consider the business planning process needed to ensure effective strategy. Indeed, in one of my earlier blogs a few years ago, I addressed why execution often fails despite what appears to be a well-developed strategy. This examination identified a number of long-standing myths of best execution practices, namely in the categories of alignment, commitment, communications, performance culture, and executive leadership. The study instead ironically found many of these practices often can get in the way of a successful strategic planning outcome.
The purpose of this follow-up blog, then, is to illustrate two examples of how organizations have used the thinking and planning activities to more fully ensure they properly execute their strategy. While they may not necessarily be “best” practices, they are certainly very solid ones that, if carried out, can deliver meaningful and readily applicable strategic outcomes. It is my belief that strategy without execution is misaligned, while execution without strategy is misdirected. It is not so difficult to fathom that often those good at strategy formulation are not so good at execution. These cases show how both thinking and planning can take root in the process. For each, I have listed the various strategic thinking and planning activities used.
Strategic Thinking Activities
Interviews with board and senior staff members
Competitive analysis
Industry analysis
Description of structuralist vs. reconstructionist approaches
SWOT analysis
Management capability/competency assessment
Customer surveys
Success challenges
Strategic Planning Activities
Development of mission, vision, values
Growth metrics defined
Creation of strategic imperatives
Listing of key initiatives
Critical actions determined
Milestones delineated
Determination of expected outcomes and performance measures
Growth plan defined
Identification and assignment of needed resources
Listing of endings (things they will stop doing)
Strategic Thinking Activities
Strategic visioning retreat
Micro and macro higher education trends identified
Provocateurs and thought leaders invited to speak
Future-thinking task force created
Case studies reviewed and summarized
Burning platforms identified
Impact/uncertainty matrix developed
Potential future scenarios created
Strategic Planning Activities
Review of previous five-year plans
Revision of current mission statement
Creation of major strategic themes
Prioritization of main issues and challenges
Questions posed about brand, technology, affordability, advancement, value proposition, and campus utilization
Development of a desired future state vision
Creation of a success assessment
Development of a new five-year plan
As illustrated by the above-listed activities, what takes place during the thinking stage is quite different from what takes place during the planning process. The first assists in pulling all the relevant background information together in one place. The second applies this information to the development of an executional plan to move forward.
While these are examples from perhaps very different businesses in which you are involved, what activities could you apply to your own situation? What strategic thinking and planning activities have you already completed and what ones do you still need to work on? Which stage—thinking or planning—have you tended to lean more toward, and why?
For more insight, check out my book The Complete Guide to Building and Growing a Talent Development Firm.
You've Reached ATD Member-only Content
Become an ATD member to continue
Already a member?Sign In