ATD, association for talent development

ATD Blog

Visionary Employees: Are Companies Losing Them for the Wrong Reasons?

By and

Tue Jun 25 2013

Loading...
Visionary Employees: Are Companies Losing Them for the Wrong Reasons?-ae6470bb7490a309a9fcd9bcf7a274fb04c523ebf981f4f9f44bffbe23bc10b5

Content

The “failure to establish a cultural fit” is the top reason that executives fail within organizations, according to the Corporate Leadership Council’s 2004 landmark research for employee engagement, Driving Performance and Retention Through Employee Engagement, A Quantitative Analysis of Effective Engagement Strategies .

The “failure to establish a cultural fit” is the top reason that executives fail within organizations, according to the Corporate Leadership Council’s 2004 landmark research for employee engagement, Driving Performance and Retention Through Employee Engagement, A Quantitative Analysis of Effective Engagement Strategies.

Content

Companies have tried to solve the problem of executive engagement and the resulting talent drain by designing onboarding programs that help train new managers and acclimate them to the company culture. But what if the culture and associated politics are part of the problem? Or what if some of the most visionary, innovative managers have the biggest challenges dealing with politics and culture?

Companies have tried to solve the problem of executive engagement and the resulting talent drain by designing onboarding programs that help train new managers and acclimate them to the company culture. But what if the culture and associated politics are part of the problem? Or what if some of the most visionary, innovative managers have the biggest challenges dealing with politics and culture?

Content

Because the topic is innovation, let’s switch gears completely. Think back to your high school class. Remember the smart kid who never seemed to fit in? When he or she spoke up in class, nobody—including the teacher—seemed to completely grasp what the student was saying? Within the high school culture, that person may have been labeled as the “brain” or the “nerd” or even a “loser.”

Because the topic is innovation, let’s switch gears completely. Think back to your high school class. Remember the smart kid who never seemed to fit in? When he or she spoke up in class, nobody—including the teacher—seemed to completely grasp what the student was saying? Within the high school culture, that person may have been labeled as the “brain” or the “nerd” or even a “loser.”

Content

Flash forward to your high school reunion. That same kid now runs an innovative software company, creates new processes for international shipping, or is a successful consultant in a brand new field that she invented.

Flash forward to your high school reunion. That same kid now runs an innovative software company, creates new processes for international shipping, or is a successful consultant in a brand new field that she invented. 

Content

The point? Sometimes the people who are being written off by companies may be the very people who they need the most. A combination of cultural resistance to new ideas and the visionary employee’s low tolerance for politics can result in something we like to call “Employment Deficit Disorder.” It’s a tongue-in-cheek reference to a very real problem.

The point? Sometimes the people who are being written off by companies may be the very people who they need the most. A combination of cultural resistance to new ideas and the visionary employee’s low tolerance for politics can result in something we like to call “Employment Deficit Disorder.” It’s a tongue-in-cheek reference to a very real problem.

Content

We piloted research among a group of 55 executives, over half at director level and above. Some 80 percent of respondents had left a job involuntarily, and 45 percent had done so two or more times. The top reasons they were let go?

We piloted research among a group of 55 executives, over half at director level and above. Some 80 percent of respondents had left a job involuntarily, and 45 percent had done so two or more times. The top reasons they were let go?

  • Content

    Did not get along with the boss; 50 percent.

    Did not get along with the boss; 50 percent.

  • Content

    Ran into political problem: 42 percent.

    Ran into political problem: 42 percent.

  • Content

    There was a power play and I lost; 34 percent.

    There was a power play and I lost; 34 percent.

  • Content

    Stood up for department/employees in the face of pressure; 21 percent.

    Stood up for department/employees in the face of pressure; 21 percent.

Content

Only 18 percent were let go because they did not perform as expected.

Only 18 percent were let go because they did not perform as expected.

Content

In that same sample, 98 percent said they had been in jobs where they needed or wanted to leave. What were the top reasons cited?

In that same sample, 98 percent said they had been in jobs where they needed or wanted to leave. What were the top reasons cited?

  • Content

    Political environment was stifling; 51 percent.

    Political environment was stifling; 51 percent.

  • Content

    Management would say one thing but do another; 48 percent.

    Management would say one thing but do another; 48 percent.

  • Content

    Environment resisted change and new ideas; 34 percent.

    Environment resisted change and new ideas; 34 percent.

Content

Only 22 percent of those surveyed were hired to replace a former employee. Most were brought on board to make changes, start a new business unit, build staff, create new products, serve the customer in new ways and increase the value of the company.

Only 22 percent of those surveyed were hired to replace a former employee. Most were brought on board to make changes, start a new business unit, build staff, create new products, serve the customer in new ways and increase the value of the company.

Content

Why were they unable to accomplish those objectives?

Why were they unable to accomplish those objectives?

  • Content

    Overwhelming politics and power plays; 64 percent

    Overwhelming politics and power plays; 64 percent

  • Content

    Company/boss wasn’t open to change/new ideas/new ways of thinking; 45 percent

    Company/boss wasn’t open to change/new ideas/new ways of thinking; 45 percent

  • Content

    Lack of management support; 40 percent.

    Lack of management support; 40 percent.

Content

Only 30 percent cited lack of resources as a reason for failure to achieve what they were hired for in the first place.

Only 30 percent cited lack of resources as a reason for failure to achieve what they were hired for in the first place.

Content

Does this initial research point to a much larger problem? We’d like your help in extending this pilot research to a larger population. Here’s the link to participate in the study and to pass on to others. We need your help to dig into what is spurring this disconnect between visionary employees and corporate culture.

Does this initial research point to a much larger problem? We’d like your help in extending this pilot research to a larger population. Here’s the link to participate in the study and to pass on to others. We need your help to dig into what is spurring this disconnect between visionary employees and corporate culture.

You've Reached ATD Member-only Content

Become an ATD member to continue

Already a member?Sign In


Copyright © 2026 ATD

ASTD changed its name to ATD to meet the growing needs of a dynamic, global profession.

Terms of UsePrivacy NoticeCookie Policy